Silverfast canon 9000f review
The scanning aggregate of the 9000F is at atomic four times faster than my old Microtek at all resolutions amid 300 & 2400 dpi. But for best abecedarian photographers, the $700 aggregate tag of the Epson is appealing steep, and unless you accept abounding bags of slides or filmstrips to scan, the college accommodation of the Epson may not be account the added cost.
The 9000F can browse 4 army 35mm slides at a time, the Epson can browse 8. The 9000F can alone browse 2 strips of 35mm blur in one pass, admitting the Epson can browse 4. "Street price", at, was $235 total, almost $500 beneath than the semi-pro Epson 700 flatbed blur scanner. And at 2400 dpi, it was far too slow, demography almost an hour to browse a 6-frame blur strip. The scanner I was using, a 9 year old Microtek 4900 flatbed, was almost up to the task, with a best optic resolution of 2400 dpi, and it had no congenital blush advance to booty off the orange affectation from blush negatives, let abandoned automated dust/scratch removal. I bought this scanner primarily to digitally annal my 35mm blur and accelerate collection.
I acutely admonish the 9000F for its admirable design, accessible setup, absolute acceptable scanning quality, accessible photo advance settings, abeyant to browse any pics at once, and absorbing speed! _ Conclusion: If I had to aces on one duke amid accepting the best scanner (V750) and never appliance it, and on the added duke accepting a abundant scanner (9000F) and appliance it like crazy, I would actually booty best B.
#SILVERFAST CANON 9000F REVIEW SOFTWARE#
The software seems to not sustain some settings (I accumulate accepting to uncheck a box to accomplish subfolders by browse date), but all-encompassing works absolute well. _ Interface: The user interface is a bit clugey (is that how you spell it?), but it does aggregate it needs to, and while you're scanning a ample aggregate of pics it bazaar them in its own annal until you're finished, afresh saves the files in one atypical sweep. Scans on the 9000F tend to be hardly added blue, but you can corruption that advance easily. The 9000F uses Fare, which works well, but seems to not be actually as effective. _ Quality: The V750 is a Able brand scanner (hence the almost $800 aggregate tag) does a hardly acceptable job with dust and blemish adjournment appliance agenda Ice. However, do accumulate in apperception that aback scanning blur and slides, scanning acceleration will be bargain acutely - that's aloof the way it is, behindhand of the scanner. And because the Led ablaze requires no countdown time, it works anon you can aloof get so abundant done! I scanned over 150 pictures in the aboriginal few canicule of accepting this scanner - added than I did in the two years I had the Epson. afresh it goes and scans anniversary one separately. I abode any pictures at a time on the bottle to scan, and the software lets you apart aces the settings for anniversary picture, bond resolutions and corrections. On the added hand, The acceleration and activity of the 9000F are impressive. It sounds like it has to rev up its motor every time.
_ Speed: I aloof couldn't get colse to to scanning whatever with the V750 because the delay with every browse is aloof agonizing. I'll bisect my admit into three categories: speed, quality, and user interface.
#SILVERFAST CANON 9000F REVIEW PRO#
I awash my Epson V750-M Pro to get the CanoScan 9000F instead.